Developing the capacity of Nigerian teachers in training through constructive alignment principles

Bakky Ngozi Adirika, Geoffrey Chiweyite Onyebuchi

Abstract


Constructive alignment is an outcome based approach to
teaching in which the learning outcomes that students intend to
achieve are defined before teaching takes place. The principles
behind the concept of constructive alignment had been with
experts in the field of curriculum studies since the time the
classical theorist Ralph Tyler posed the four very important
questions that have influenced teaching to date. However, the
effective negotiation of intended learning outcomes and the
alignment of leaning activities and assessment methods have
remained serious missing links generally, making it difficult for
Nigerian teachers to effectively develop the capacity of their
students to competitively stand out in all professional and
employability skills that should constitute the hall mark of the
educated. Teachers cannot give what they do not have. Thanks to
globalisation efforts and the sharing of successful efforts for the
good of humanity. Participating in Tuning Africa II program
exposed us to insights that would assist the Nigerian teacher to
prove his mettle and develop in his student, the ability and
respect that would forge him into an individual of confidence,
skill and honour. This paper shares these insights.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawi, T., Gustafsson, M., Saalman, E., Stehlik, T. & Thew, N.

(2011, November) A university wide action research project

to enhance teaching through constructive alignment. A paper

presented at the SUHF (Association of Swedish Higher

Education) Konferens Att leda hogre utbildning, Karolinska

Institut, Stockholm.

Adirika, B.N. (2014). Action based teaching in Nigeria: issues

and reflections. African Research Review 8 (33) April, 336-

Adirika, B. N. (2014). Teaching for social reconstruction: the

Nigerian teacher in perspective. Mediterranean Journal of

Social Sciences 5(16) July, 284-288.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive

alignment. Higher Education, 32. 347-364

Biggs, J. (2013). Changing universities: A memoir about academe

in different places and times. Melbourne, strictly literary.

Biggs, J.B & Tang, C. (2011). Train the Trainers: Implementing

outcome based education in Malasia. Malasian Journal of

Learning and Instruction. 8, 1-20

Cobham, D.C. & Jacques, K. (2006). Constructive alignment:

reflections on implementation. Proceedings of First Annual

Workshop on Constructive alignment. February, 2006.

Nottingham. Trent University.

Federal Repulic of Nigeria (FRN) (2014). National Policy on

Education. Abuja, NERDC

Hil, R. (2012). Whackademia. Sydney: New South Publishing.

Kandlbunder, P. & Peseta, T. (2009). Key concepts in

Postgraduate certificates in higher education teaching and

learning in Australia and the United Kingdom. International

Journal for Academic Development 14 (1)19-31.

Larkin, H. & Richardson, B. (2013).Creating high challenge/high

support academic environment through constructive

alignment: Students outcomes. Teaching in Higher

Education 18 (2) 192-204.

Moulding, N. T. (2010). Intelligent design: student perceptions of

teaching and learning in large social work classes. Higher

Education Research and Development 29 (2) 151-165.

Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of

Educational Research 56. 411-436


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.