Gender inequality: Evidence from male/female staff interaction in selected universities in southeast, Nigeria

Chioma Theresa Izuegbunam

Abstract


The struggle to improve the conditions of the female gender has
continued to receive significant attention over the decades.
Gender inequality has been a prevailing topic that has received a
wide recognition from various scholars and writers. However,
despite, these wide recognitions, female subjugation is evident in
every stratum of human society. This study provides evidence of
this by focusing on gender inequality in education at the tertiary
level, considering features of male/female staff interaction. The
following question has therefore driven this study: what type of
utterances is used by male staff of higher institutions to show
gender bias in male/female staff interaction? Participant
observation is the major instrument of data collection. However,
relevant library sources have been utilized. The theoretical thrust
of this study is feminism, which advocates for equal rights
between men and women. The contextualization cues theory of
John Gumperz has been appropriated to discuss the type of
utterances which feature in male/female staff interaction. The
findings indicate that gender sensitive expressions still
characterize male utterances and these are laced with
paralinguistic features such as shaking the head, interruption,
frowning etc to show disapproval against female responses.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beitz, R. The Idea of Human Rights.Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 2009. Print.

Chukwukere, Gloria. “The Role of Women in Life and

Literature”. Gender Voices and Choices: Redefining Women

in Contemporary African Fiction. Enugu: Fourth Dimension,

Print.

Dobie, Ann. “Feminist Criticism”. Theory into Practice: An

Introduction to Literary Criticism. (3rded.). Louisiana:

Wordsworth, 2012. Print.

Ezeigbo, Akachi T. Gender Issues in Nigeria: A Feminine

Perspective. Lagos: Vista Books, 1994. Print.

Gumperz, J. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1982. Print.

… Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. 1982. Print.

Hannum, H. “The Concept of Human Rights”. International

Human Rights: Problems of Law, Policy and

Practice.London: Aspen Publishers, 2006. Print.

Hornby, S. A. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. (7thed.)

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.

Lerner, Gerda. The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford

University Press, 1986. Print.

Meade, Teresa, and Pamela Haag.“Persistent Patriarchy: Ghost or

Reality?”. Radical History Review 71: 91–95.1998. Print.

Moghadam, Valentine M. “Patriarchy in Transition: Women and

the Changing Family in the Middle East”. Journal of

Comparative Family Studies 35: 137–162.2004. Print.

Morris, M.L. “Low-Income Women and the Higher Education

Act Reauthorization”. On Campus with Women, Vol. 33 (3),

Print.

Nnolim, Charles. “African Feminism: The Scandalous Path”.

“Contemporary Nigerian Fiction”. Issues in African

Literature. Bayelsa: Treasure Books, 2009. Print.

Umoren, Tonia. Portrait of Womanhood in African Literary

Tradition. Reflection on Elechi Amadi’s Works. Akwa Ibom:

Development Universal Consortia, 2002. Print.

Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman:

With Strictures on political and moral subjects. Boston:

Library of Congress, 1792. Print.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.